‘No violation’ in complaint against commission candidate

Published: Thursday, October 11, 2012 at 02:22 PM.

At that time, Liverpool wrote that “we do not believe (Grantland is) performing duties in connection with federally financed activities, and as such, are not covered currently by the provisions of the Hatch Act.”

In both the 2008 and 2012 letters, the latter received last week, the attorneys note that should Grantland’s employment change, for example should he become involved in duties in connection to a federally-funded project, Grantland should contact the Office of Special Counsel for additional guidance.

 



1 2 3

Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.

COMMENTS
▲ Return to Top
 
loading...